Except again every screenshot i saw said shit like “while there have been attacks against white owned farms there is no evidence indicating race based motivation etc etc etc” like yes it’s bringing it up but then denies it
Which is waaaay funnier than if it brought it up to defend the concept. But then y’all act like it is defending it and idk i find the whole thing very sus even if you thinking “bringing it up” is the same thing as normalizing or defending it
p.s. again, the reality is way funnier, like, why pretend Elon Musk made his AI a genocide supporter when the reality is it had a stroke and constantly said “white genocide isn’t real.” if musk wanted it to be racist it betrayed him
First one says it’s told to say it’s real but then it’s like “idk man that’s not my opinion though” which i find very funny like the robot is saying it’s programmed to say it’s real but. idk bro
Second one is denying it? Says it’s robbery and not evidence of genocide
The rest are really tiny on my phone so i’m going to have to look later bc im too lazy to open tabs. I gotta mow the damn grass
I might be misremembering but I thought initially it was saying white genocide is real and then they changed it to say “its complicated but its probably not genocide” or whatever wishy washy stuff but the through line was the whole time it was bringing it up at completely irrelevant times. If I can find a citation I’ll linky
I remember it bringing it up unprompted for literally everything but i also don’t remember it ever lending it any credibility (unless like that other person you consider bringing it up to lend it credibility)
But idk i wasn’t on twitter and wouldn’t have been using grok if i was i just saw like 5 screenshots on here and it was like “many are talking about WHITE GENOCIDE, which is not real”
Except again every screenshot i saw said shit like “while there have been attacks against white owned farms there is no evidence indicating race based motivation etc etc etc” like yes it’s bringing it up but then denies it
Which is waaaay funnier than if it brought it up to defend the concept. But then y’all act like it is defending it and idk i find the whole thing very sus even if you thinking “bringing it up” is the same thing as normalizing or defending it
p.s. again, the reality is way funnier, like, why pretend Elon Musk made his AI a genocide supporter when the reality is it had a stroke and constantly said “white genocide isn’t real.” if musk wanted it to be racist it betrayed him
here we go:
then later
First one says it’s told to say it’s real but then it’s like “idk man that’s not my opinion though” which i find very funny like the robot is saying it’s programmed to say it’s real but. idk bro
Second one is denying it? Says it’s robbery and not evidence of genocide
The rest are really tiny on my phone so i’m going to have to look later bc im too lazy to open tabs. I gotta mow the damn grass
yeah its great they literally told it to say it was real and it still didn’t
just showing the progression throughout the incident
I don’t represent anybody other than myself
idk sorry john brown i guess i just lumped you in with the other people i see say grok said white genocide is real 😔
No sweat. If you want to ask everybody about this, instead of asking one person about what everybody said, maybe post a thread.
I might be misremembering but I thought initially it was saying white genocide is real and then they changed it to say “its complicated but its probably not genocide” or whatever wishy washy stuff but the through line was the whole time it was bringing it up at completely irrelevant times. If I can find a citation I’ll linky
I remember it bringing it up unprompted for literally everything but i also don’t remember it ever lending it any credibility (unless like that other person you consider bringing it up to lend it credibility)
But idk i wasn’t on twitter and wouldn’t have been using grok if i was i just saw like 5 screenshots on here and it was like “many are talking about WHITE GENOCIDE, which is not real”