Claims being made: Operation Matthew 4:19

  1. Billionaires met in November 2013

  2. one month later announced in December 2013 that they were going to troll the entire world (over gender)

  3. AFTER the start of New Year 2014, AFTER the November 2013 meetings and December 2013 trolling operation announcement: to wage war against Ukraine

  4. The Matthew 4:19 trolling operation planned in 2013 would not end, as was published in 2014 “The underlying aim, Surkov says, is not to win the war, but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception, in order to manage and control.”

 

Operation Matthew 4:19 was initiated in March 2013 even before November 2013 meeting.

  1. Some even claim that the World Wide Web trolling operation by billionaires against everyday people was initiated via Twitter in November 2012, a year before the billionaires met in November 2013 - the first claim, #1 on list above

  2. The World Wide social media trolling operation was launched on the Web in early 2013 but not reported in Western news sources until middle of year 2014

 

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    1·
    5 days ago

    We can’t you clearly have a massive media ecology literacy failure and problem.

    Is this your standard reply for everyone you disagree with? You just pretend you’re superior because you got some specialized degree? Do I start looking down at you now because you probably don’t know shit about organic synthesis (or queer theory)?

    You respond so quickly, you don’t actually think.

    I got a pair of very quick hands that can keep with my thinking in my second language. Maybe you need to speed up your own thinking or get yourself a copy of Mavis Beacon. We need to add “can’t fathom individual differences” to the list of things you seem incapable of doing here.

    • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
      1·
      5 days ago

      You just pretend you’re superior because

      Nope. The topic here is the “mass mind”, the entire group. But you have ego problems and think I’m talking about one person and this is a pissing contenst. I have a Lemmy community for you on that: !MasturbatoryEgoism@lemm.ee

      me me me / i i i / Stephen Gutknecht vs. others in comment section.

      I suggest you read from dead authors: Carl Sagan, Neil Postman, Joseph Campbell, James Joyce, and Marshall McLuhan. All died. So you don’t think I’m here to talk about my own self for any purpose other than addressing the crisis in the world / crisis in United States of America of April 2025.

      lot of computer users today get very ego-centered and self-centered.

      I would not be on any social media platform except that they are the very outlet and cause of so many problems in the world in April 2025. I am not entertained by the garbage junk all over social media, I don’t find it LOL funny.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        1·
        5 days ago

        But you have ego problems … I have a Lemmy community for you on that … lot of computer users today get very ego-centered and self-centered.

        Damn, the projection is strong. Don’t forget I was very polite with you and yet here we are because of you trying to pull some shit.

        The topic here is the “mass mind”,

        The topic was me trying to find the gender in the articles. Guess you must’ve forgotten about that little detail.

        I suggest you read from dead authors

        I suggest you stop pretending you’re better educated for name-dropping some authors. You’re literally asking an atheist to read Carl Sagan ffs. In case you don’t get it, it’s like me asking you to read the Bible as a religious fanatic. xD

        • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
          1·
          5 days ago

          you must’ve forgotten about that little detail.

          I haven’t forgotten.

          What you have is a “target fixation” on me, Stephen Alfred Gutknecht. You think this is about two people.

          I suggest you stop pretending you’re better educated for name-dropping some authors

          More of your egomania, induced by Lemmy media enviornment.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            1·
            5 days ago

            What you have is a “target fixation"

            And what you have is caught red handed lying and being avoidant while shielding yourself behind a thin veil of eruditism.

            You think this is about two people.

            Your petty squabbles have turned into such. Instead of answering my initial question and moving on you’ve decided to do everything but. Sus af.

            More of your egomania, induced by Lemmy media enviornment.

            Pot calling the kettle black much. You’re like a frog that specializes in feeling temperature and yet you’re here in the boiling water with us it seems. Tons of ego, just as much projection all because you got caught lying.

            • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
              1·
              5 days ago

              Your petty squabbles have turned into such.

              Lemmy did. Electric media systems and English language did. Not me. I’m not being petty.

              You do not understand media ecology. And every reply demonstrates this.

              I recommend you go to another source of information, stop your comment section fixation on my personal language and comments: “Context Blindness: Digital Technology and the Next Stage of Human Evolution (Understanding Media Ecology, 10)” is recommended.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                1·
                5 days ago

                Lemmy did. … I’m not being petty.

                YOU did LOL. I asked you nicely. Look at you here and now. What are you doing. How is this not petty and how are you not perpetrating this?

                You do not understand media ecology. And every reply demonstrates this.

                Of course I don’t, I just learned about it today and yet that has nothing to do with me asking about where the gender is in your articles. Where is the gender? Nowhere to be found. So much for media ecology huh. Seems a bit irrelevant in the midst of things.

                I recommend you go to another source of information

                I can’t, I’m too fixated on you not giving me a reasonable answer and playing around instead. Seems like there is no answer and you lied in your title.

                • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
                  1·
                  5 days ago

                  YOU did LOL. I asked you nicely.

                  LOL LOL LOL. that’s all you keep doing, clowning.

                  I asked you nicely.

                  The “Tower of Babel” metaphor problem has nothing to do with decoration or tone of voice or “nicely”. You do not understand media ecology.

                  Seems like there is no answer and you lied in your title.

                  Your egomania.

                  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                    1·
                    5 days ago

                    LOL LOL LOL. that’s all you keep doing, clowning.

                    Gee, I wonder why I keep doing it. LOL Maybe it’s got something to do with your short fuse. xD Click click those easy buttons.

                    The “Tower of Babel” metaphor problem has nothing to do with decoration or tone of voice or “nicely”. You do not understand media ecology.

                    You shield away from decency with your thin veneer of erudition.