Claims being made: Operation Matthew 4:19

  1. Billionaires met in November 2013

  2. one month later announced in December 2013 that they were going to troll the entire world (over gender)

  3. AFTER the start of New Year 2014, AFTER the November 2013 meetings and December 2013 trolling operation announcement: to wage war against Ukraine

  4. The Matthew 4:19 trolling operation planned in 2013 would not end, as was published in 2014 “The underlying aim, Surkov says, is not to win the war, but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception, in order to manage and control.”

 

Operation Matthew 4:19 was initiated in March 2013 even before November 2013 meeting.

  1. Some even claim that the World Wide Web trolling operation by billionaires against everyday people was initiated via Twitter in November 2012, a year before the billionaires met in November 2013 - the first claim, #1 on list above

  2. The World Wide social media trolling operation was launched on the Web in early 2013 but not reported in Western news sources until middle of year 2014

 

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    1·
    7 days ago

    how you are attracted to shit information

    Like the articles you posted? That kind of shit? You’re right.

    I’m brutally honest

    In your titles? Yeah, I see that.

    • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
      1·
      7 days ago

      You’re right.

      I know I am correct because you show you have an attraction to shit reply messages on Lemmy and you won’t stop replying to me.

      I see this all over the Internet on every media platform since Q4 2014 when the “Internet Research Agency” had delivered their payloads for 18 months. Everybody started to be attracted to shit comment messages. It’s a problem of the entire population, everyone, not just you. !ClownPopulation@lemm.ee

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        1·
        7 days ago

        I know I am correct because

        Oh, was it not your autism that makes you automatically correct? Damn, I was expecting you to whip it out again as if it means anything. Maybe try mentioning some other unrelated thing as the cause, maybe that’ll work

        you won’t stop replying to me.

        HELLOOOO KETTLE. lmao

        everyone, not just you

        Yep, everyone. I’m seeing it right now.

        • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
          1·
          7 days ago

          Maybe try mentioning some other unrelated thing as the cause, maybe that’ll work

          It works for your information warfare methods on Lemmy. To do ANYTHING but discuss the billionaire topic.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            1·
            7 days ago

            To do ANYTHING but discuss the billionaire topic.

            Much like doing ANYTHING to avoid the non-existent gender topic in those articles.

            • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
              1·
              7 days ago

              the non-existent gender topic in those articles.

              Again, you have a literacy problem. I suggest Marshall McLuhan and Neil Postman as teachers.

              The article clearly discusses gender topic. Vladimir Putin is calling on the conservatives of the world to unite—behind him.The Kremlin leader’s full-throated defense of Russia’s “traditional values” and his derision of the West’s “genderless and infertile” liberalism in his annual state-of-the-nation address last week was just the latest example of Putin attempting to place himself at the vanguard of a new “Conservative International.”

               

              Really I can not determine if you are just being an agent to serve the Kremlin / Billionaire systems. There really are people who have a literacy problem as bad as yours, and that’s the only reason I haven’t abandoned this thread.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                1·
                7 days ago

                Again, you have a literacy problem.

                You’re the one confusing gender with gender roles and sexual orientation, hon. You have a problem sticking to the facts. Don’t try it, you know it’s not true.

                • RoundSparrow @ .ee@lemm.eeOPM
                  1·
                  7 days ago

                  You’re the one confusing gender with gender roles and sexual orientation,

                  NO, I’m not. The word “Gender” is right in Putin’s 2013 speech. “Genderless”.

                  You have a literacy problem. I suggest teachers Neil Postman and Marshall McLuhan.

                  You have a problem sticking to the facts.

                  No, I have a problem of information warfare tactics being used against me by a Lemmy computer user who keeps replying to waste my time. A form of harassment and “denial of service” to exhaust me / distract me from more important work. Very commonly used on social media in year 2024 and year 2025 across all platforms.

                  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                    1·
                    7 days ago

                    The Kremlin leader’s full-throated defense of Russia’s “traditional values” and his derision of the West’s “genderless and infertile” liberalism in his annual state-of-the-nation address last week was just the latest example of Putin attempting to place himself at the vanguard of a new “Conservative International.”

                    Get the FULL quote from the article. Note how genderless and infertile modifies liberalism to mean neutered, ineffective, incapable, and amorphous. It means decadent and weak, referencing the apparent obsession with LGBTQ+ rights and feminism rather than strong families and national identity that Russia pretends to champion.

                    It does not mean gender as in gender roles or gender identity specifically, which is why I asked in the first place before you went apeshit. So much for media illiteracy, huh.

                    E: It’s “genderless and infertile” both modifying liberalism, not just genderless.