paequ2@lemmy.today to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoHallucinating sourceslemmy.todayimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1666arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1659arrow-down1imageHallucinating sourceslemmy.todaypaequ2@lemmy.today to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square92fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredanc4498@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·20 hours agoIs this an ad for Perplexity? I’ve never heard of it, and now I’m googling it. So effective ad if so.
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·19 hours agoWould be weird for an ad to bash on the paid tier
minus-squaredanc4498@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·19 hours agoYeah, it’s one of those “no bad press” kind of things. It’s bashing on AI, but Perplexity actually looks pretty good by comparison.
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-219 hours agoI’m saying the Perplexity paid tier is about 2x more likely to be confidently wrong than Perplexity
minus-squareComtief@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 hours agoIdk but search is what they do, they use regular AI models like chatgpt or claude with their own search tool.
Is this an ad for Perplexity? I’ve never heard of it, and now I’m googling it. So effective ad if so.
Would be weird for an ad to bash on the paid tier
Yeah, it’s one of those “no bad press” kind of things. It’s bashing on AI, but Perplexity actually looks pretty good by comparison.
I’m saying the Perplexity paid tier is about 2x more likely to be confidently wrong than Perplexity
Oh, right, good point.
deleted by creator
Idk but search is what they do, they use regular AI models like chatgpt or claude with their own search tool.