• Suite404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        She is 100% an option, but not for the current Democrat party. They will push her our like they did Sanders.

          • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            2 days ago

            And mine from not abroad.

            The Dems are controlled opposition who are funded by the billionaires just like the Rs.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          Democratic party needs to split up. Bernie has been calling on more senators and congressmen to go independent, but none have jumped off the rotten DNC ship.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            There’s an inherent strategic advantage to claiming the party brand, because so much has been invested in raising its name recognition.

            Very hard to get people to throw away a shot at a winnable primary in pursuit of a much more difficult independent run.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            We need the infrastructure. The parties are too entrenched in law and election structures…

            So the only choice is to tea party them, build a left wing of the party and take over. And I think that’s what AOC and Bernie are running around doing, but it’s going to take time

            In the meantime, we need to resist

            • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              This. I’ve been saying for a bit now that we need our own tea party movement to push the DNC left

            • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Bernie has been independent for essentially his entire career. Why is it possible for him, but not others?

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Bernie has been independent for essentially his entire career.

                Precisely because he’s been in politics since the 80s and is a brand name in Vermont.

                And he still caucuses with the Dems. He didn’t run for president as an independent. He knows the perils of appearing as a spoiler candidate as well as any Stein or Nader.

              • theneverfox@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                And how much control does Bernie and the other independents have? Not much… He generally votes with the Democrats and occasionally speaks out

                We don’t need another 5 independents. We need a couple dozen in a cohesive voting block. We need enough that Democrats will be forced to negotiate with them (because maga won’t)

                It’s very hard to win as an independent, but it can be done. We need more then that though - we need a party, we need the network of organizers, the infrastructure for donations, and to integrate with 50 slightly different systems for elections

                And most importantly, you need name recognition

                All these things would take years of maintained effort to establish, but they exist - better to become a key faction of the democratic party than to compete with them directly

    • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      After Kamala there’s no way they’ll have another female candidate. The American people would rather vote for all the adjectives that describe Trump than a woman.

      • frostysauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s exactly why they would run another woman candidate. You don’t think the dems are trying to win, do you?

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Clinton and Harris are just fake smiles on a status quo neoliberal platform. Of course that didn’t go anywhere. Elizabeth Warren might have stood a chance. AOC is outright popular now but I don’t think she would have won, yet.

        • lemonaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The “Fight Oligarchy” rallies and “Hands Off” protests need to get bigger. Then she could be popular enough.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        After Kamala there’s no way they’ll have another female candidate.

        Which is extra funny given that candidates like Gretchen Witmer, Liz Warren, and AOC are some of their most popular candidates the party still has to offer.

        Gruesome Newsom is going to clinch then nomination on a platform of “America is a fundamentally misogynistic nation” and liberals are going to waltz into 2028 screaming “Vote for us! We hate women more than the Republicans!”

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’ll believe it when I see it. He’s still got the Getty fortune and the Lib half of California media firmly behind him

            • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              True, but he’s burned his bridges with the Left via transphobia and trying to court the Right, and with the Right by inviting Right Wingers to the podcast and then calling them Bible Thumpers while trying to court them.

              He’s got a life raft that’ll prevent him from drowning overnight, but he took a swing at the big time and missed.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                he’s burned his bridges with the Left via transphobia

                He burned it with The Left when he came after the homeless way back during his San Fransisco mayorship. That hasn’t really hurt him, because liberals continue to love the guy.

                He’s got a life raft that’ll prevent him from drowning overnight

                He’s the Andrew Cuomo of the West Coast. He’ll never drown. Like a fat turd, he’ll always float to the top.

      • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        If that’s the lesson dems took from the election, dems are going to lose again.

        Stop pushing far right republicans as the dem nominees, regardless of their supposed genitals.

      • Baggie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It was quite a blow to my “all humans are inherently good” mindset, I’m now going with “all humans probably have some deeply rooted cultural biases”.

          • Baggie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Because babies aren’t racist, sexist, etc. We’re not perfect, and we get some weird ideas as we go through life, but in general I think most people are generally just trying to get by and do their best.

            But also yeah sometimes you have to do a violence or whatever.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Maternal instincts, the lived experience of kindness between friends and neighbors, and the last 10,000 years of gradual but undeniable improvements in social equity could argue this point.

            I might also argue that humans are fundamentally good, but still highly mutable. So a few bad apples really can spoil the bunch.