Claims being made: Operation Matthew 4:19
-
AFTER the start of New Year 2014, AFTER the November 2013 meetings and December 2013 trolling operation announcement: to wage war against Ukraine
-
The Matthew 4:19 trolling operation planned in 2013 would not end, as was published in 2014 “The underlying aim, Surkov says, is not to win the war, but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception, in order to manage and control.”
Operation Matthew 4:19 was initiated in March 2013 even before November 2013 meeting.
-
The World Wide social media trolling operation was launched on the Web in early 2013 but not reported in Western news sources until middle of year 2014
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995
For asking you to clarify? Since when is that a word game? I’m gay, I was part of the trans community for a literal decade. To me gays & trans are two completely different things like mangoes and avocados. And you think I’m playing word games for making a distinction that sticks out like a sore thumb to me?
This stuff obviously stands out to me. But it doesn’t stand out to you because you are the one unfamiliar with it and so you think it’s all the same just because the article mentioned something tangentially inside the ball park of the LGBTQIA+ nebula, I guess. I mean, you think “transgenders” is a verb, ffs.
What are you on about? Honestly.
I think you’re purposely choosing inflammatory language in your post and now you’re trying to pull some shady shit in the comments because I’m asking questions.
How people use social machines, Lemmy, Twitter, to dehumanize. Media ecology.
Huh? I’m asking you what shit are you trying to pull here with me, not what your life mission is.
Zero. If you want shit, I suggest you go to other communities like !memes@lemmy.world on Lemmy where you can frolic in decorated memes. Or if you want shit, go to Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News. Or go to Elon Musk content, or Donald Trump messages.
I’m in the United States of America, we are drowning in shit media being reproduced by machines.
You’re right, why am I wasting my time here with you.
You are supporting the Kremlin by wasting my time, by badgering me.
Where is the gender? Please enlighten us about this gender you’re talking about in all these articles that nobody but you can see. lol
https://mastodon.social/tags/MockMockMockery
LOL
I am not pulling any “shit” with you. You are here LOL amused.
The ‘lol’ in lowercase was a reaction to your comments, not the topic. Read it again, bozo.
Yes, about the context of this conversation.
You have context blindness. Context Blindness: Digital Technology and the Next Stage of Human Evolution (Understanding Media Ecology, 10) - Are people with autism giving us a glimpse into our future human condition? Could we be driving our own evolution with our technology and, in fact, be witnessing the beginning of the next stage of human evolution? The thesis at the center of this book is that since we have delegated the ability to read context to contextual technologies such as social media, location, and sensors, we have become context blind. Since context blindness―or caetextia in Latin―is one of the most dominant symptoms of autistic behavior at the highest levels of the spectrum, people with autism may indeed be giving us a peek into our human condition soon. We could be witnessing the beginning of the next stage of human evolution―Homo caetextus. With increasingly frequent floods and fires and unbearably hot summers, the human footprint on our planet should be evident to all, but it is not because we are context blind. We can now see and feel global warming. We are witnessing evolution in real-time and birthing our successor species. Our great-grandchildren may be a species very distinct from us. This book is a must for all communication and media studies courses dealing with digital technology, media, culture, and society. And a general reading public concerned with the polarized public sphere, difficulties in sustaining democratic governance, rampant conspiracies, and phenomena such as cancel culture and the need for trigger warnings and safe spaces, will find it enlightening.
…
Somehow you think the comments don’t have to do with the postings and community context.
About your irrational reaction, omg, you’re not serious. lol Look at the shit you’re typing now implying I’m autistic. LOL
No, you’re also terrible at communicating.
I’m not implying that. The book is about “media ecology”
Lemmy is. But you don’t grasp “media ecology”.
REPEATING: Context Blindness: Digital Technology and the Next Stage of Human Evolution (Understanding Media Ecology, 10) -
And you don’t grasp queer theory so you confuse it with word play, so what.
But please, tell me about how one “transgenders” into a different gender.
Half of that description is about posing autism as the next, real-time evolutionary milestone. Do you not read what you copy & paste? Can you not narrow it down to avoid ambiguities? Can you stop blaming others for your failure to communicate effectively?
“gender roles”. I’ll reproduce the entire Wikipedia page since you think “gender” does not mean what conservatives are changing since year 2013.
Single English word “Gender”
Gender is the range of social, psychological, cultural, and behavioral aspects of being a man, woman, or other gender identity.[1][2] Depending on the context, this may include sex-based social constructs (i.e. gender roles) as well as gender expression.[3][4][5] Most cultures use a gender binary, in which gender is divided into two categories, and people are considered part of one or the other (girls/women and boys/men);[6][7][8] those who are outside these groups may fall under the umbrella term non-binary. A number of societies have specific genders besides “man” and “woman,” such as the hijras of South Asia and Two-spirit Indigenous Peoples of North America; these are often referred to as third genders (and fourth genders, etc.). Most scholars agree that gender is a central characteristic for social organization.[9]
You’re talking about gender in the title (lit “over gender”) and now you’re saying it’s gender roles. Nowhere in this entire thread have you ever mentioned gender roles up until this moment. Make up your mind.
More word games. You know, it’s so easy and trivial for you to make pot-shot comments like this, as if you are supporting the Kremlin. It takes far more labor for me to respond to your little short “gender” world games. You are clowning around on your social machine. I’ve made up my mind and told you directly.
Gender identity != gender expression. Two WHOLLY different things that only highlight your ignorance.
Let me know what you think about James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake book before you tell me about your word games. I have a community here on Lemmy !JamesJoyce@lemm.ee
You tell me when you’re through the basics of gender theory and sexual orientation. Then maybe we can move onto your book.
We can’t you clearly have a massive media ecology literacy failure and problem. You clearly can’t read Lemmy messages and The Atlantic content correctly. “The Tower of Babel” metaphor crisis. James Joyce’s work is the cure to that.
You respond so quickly, you don’t actually think. It’s an incredibly common problem on electric social media systems.
This is how Donald Trump and Elon Musk became leaders of the free world, a population who lost literacy since year 2013.
“In America, everyone is entitled to an opinion, and it is certainly useful to have a few when a pollster shows up. But these are opinions of a quite different roder from eighteenth- or nineteenth-century opinions. It is probably more accurate to call them emotions rather than opinions, which would account for the fact that they change from week to week, as the pollsters tell us. What is happening here is that television is altering the meaning of ‘being informed’ by creating a species of information that might properly be called disinformation. I am using this world almost in the precise sense in which it is used by spies in the CIA or KGB. Disinformation does not mean false information. It means misleading information–misplace, irrelevant, fragmented or superficial information–information that creates the illusion of knowing something but which in fact leads one away from knowing. In saying this, I do not mean to imply that television news deliberately aims to deprive Americans of a coherent, contextual understanding of their world. I mean to say that when news is packaged as entertainment, that is the inevitable result. And in saying that the television news show entertains but does not inform, I am saying something far more serious than that we are being deprived of authentic information. I am saying we are losing our sense of what it means to be well informed. Ignorance is always correctable. But what shall we do if we take ignorance to be knowledge?” ― Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, 1985 !BackTo1985@lemm.ee
Is this your standard reply for everyone you disagree with? You just pretend you’re superior because you got some specialized degree? Do I start looking down at you now because you probably don’t know shit about organic synthesis (or queer theory)?
I got a pair of very quick hands that can keep with my thinking in my second language. Maybe you need to speed up your own thinking or get yourself a copy of Mavis Beacon. We need to add “can’t fathom individual differences” to the list of things you seem incapable of doing here.
Yes, I’m supporting the Kremlin from Mexico as a card-carrying gay atheist. Genius.
Elon Musk is supporting the Kremlin from Austin, Texas. Donald Trump is supporting the Kremlin from Florida. The entire population of clowns on social media in the United Stats of America, hundreds of millions of people, are supporting the Kremlin by not standing up to anonymous no-identity shit they consume on social machines. What’s so special about you supporting the Kremlin from Mexico? !CounterSurkov@lemm.ee
The Hybrid War since year 2013 is on every social media platform. !HybridWarLost@lemm.ee
Mexico was one of the many words I said. Can you please repeat everything I said in conjunction and try to process that whole sentence instead?
Repeating: What’s so special about you supporting the Kremlin from Mexico?
You are supporting the Kremlin systems of governing and thinking. It doesn’t matter that much to me if you are in Austin Texas like Elon Musk or wherever. It’s a morality issue, morality is about good from bad.
You tell me. You’re the one suspecting I’m doing it. Anyway, what about that gender from the article? Is this how far you wanted to get away from the topic at hand? When are you elaborating on that?
That’s what a queer atheist Mexican does. Yep. My values align so well with the Kremlin’s on many fronts from this side of the world, you’re right on the money with that one. Absolute genius.