• MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fuck capitalism for sure, but the apps can still work. I know happily married couples who met on tinder. Not saying that it’s everyone’s experience, but still. The more avenues people are open to the better sometimes.

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      We’re a happily married couple who met through OkCupid, back when that was decent!

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Honestly, OKC back in its heyday was the place to be. So many of my friends made legitimate, genuine connections there. Devastating that they ended up being sold to match. OKC had plenty of people, but it was apparently the goto for all the nerds. A lot of them use meetup now, but there’s really nothing like what it was for nerd/nerd dating.

        • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Second that. I met my partner on OKC 8 years ago, and before I met them I also made lots of connections and had several dates with other people I met via OKC, some of whom I’m still friends with. The site certainly wasn’t perfect, all dating sites are straight up self-esteem murderers if you’re a heterosexual man, but as far as dating sites go, it was the best I’ve used because it actually tried to match you with people who shared values with you.

          At the same time I was also on tinder, and it was a barren wasteland of boring normies and felt more like a meat market than anything. I never had a meaningful match on there.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Remember how you could search for interests? I’m pretty sure you could just like type in “Final Fantasy” or “Speed Chess” and find people who liked it enough to put it on their profile.

          Now it’s just a shadow of what it used to be. A crappy tinder knockoff with vestigial profiles.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      The problem is when it works it’s despite the algorithm not because of it. It’s probably easier for women, as there are more men on dating sites and there are women on dating sites.

      • papertowels@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        We’ll have to make sure we’re not looking through rose tinted lenses here, you know what they say, the odds are good but the goods might murder you.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        I really don’t think that’s an accurate assessment of the algorithm, but seeing as I am not privy to it, and I imagine you’re not either, I’m not really sure that’s a point worth discussing.

        It’s certainly easier for women to get matches on tinder, but not really sure how that’s related. I didn’t specify the sex or sexual orientation of the couples I was referring to. And even for heterosexual couples, it does mean a man found a wife through tinder, so it being easier to get matches as a woman does not mean that men don’t get matches, it’s kinda a necessary step in the women getting matches thing.