• Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    But no little tiny tusks? No trunk? Lame. Is it so wrong to want a tiny mammoth I can hold in one hand?

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Real talk? Yes. Miniaturization of animals does not do good things for their health, in general. The systems of animal bodies are finely tuned by natural selection, and mucking with that is how you get dogs that can’t breathe because their nose has been bred into the approximate shape of a squished aluminum can. Homeostasis is easy to throw off long-term when you play around with the square-cube law.

      See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allometry#Physiological_scaling

  • the_q@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why? How about focusing on preventing more extinctions instead of some Jurassic Park bullshit.

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      IIRC, the primary reason we’re even going with this route is that one of the primary things stabilizing the arctic permafrost was actually the presence of snow-wading megafauna changing the rate of heat dissipation in high-wind tundras. So, they’re trying to bring the wooly mammoth back to try to keep more permafrost around.

      ETA: Here’s the company actually saying this is the primary reason for doing it. Its about restoring the biodiversity loss from humans being an all-around virus for the last 10000 years.

    • Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      We already know how to prevent more extinctions. Better environmental laws, more green spaces, better conservation efforts, less suburban sprawl, etc. You know, things that will never happen.

  • fiendishplan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The 15ft tall 8,000 pound mouse was last seen rampaging in the downtown area. OK that’s what I wanted the article to say.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can I be nit-picky here for a second?

    If you’re genetically modifying an elephant for cold tolerance and fur growth, you’re not “bring a mammoth back from extinction”, you’re creating a furry elephant. It may look somewhat like a mammoth, but genetically it’s not a mammoth at all.

    It’s like saying you can genetically modify a homo-sapien to have a pronounced brow ridge and a hairier back and say that you’ve brought the neandertal back from extinction. No you haven’t, you’ve just designed a human who looks different.

    • Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      And next you’ll say that genetically-modified ears aren’t enough to make catgirls real either 😩

      Can we let this one go? Not for science, not for accuracy, but for the prospect of having catgirls in our lifetimes, at least?

    • 🕸️ Pip 🕷️@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      And the most annoying part is that this is incredibly fcking useless. Wooly mammoths went extinct for a reason. Large animals are becoming less and less evolutionary preferred. Wooly mammoths are adjusted for the cold while our globe is warming.

      Can we just use our fcking resources for things that matter???

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Can we just use our fcking resources for things that matter???

        Yeah, bring back the passenger pigeon! We need more pigeons! Do something that’ll make a difference already!

        Also, can we get some dodos up in here? Where all my dumb birds at?

      • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nobody cares about wooly mammoths. This is a test of gene editing techniques that can eradicate genetic diseases.

      • FoolHen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not really, we humans killed most big land animals that we found as we expanded our territory, back when we were hunters. This happened in big “islands” like Australia and Madagascar, as well as all the small islands. There, large animals had lived in equilibrium for centuries, and their extinction matches some short time after humans arrived. An exception are the galapago islands, as they were discovered in the 19th century.

        • Merlin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          And to recreate the species they’d need hundreds of them from different genetic material. Which means they’ll likely create a single one that will eventually die and costed billions of dollars.

        • 🕸️ Pip 🕷️@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Besides the fact that the hunting hypothesis is that; a hypothesis, there’s a lot of other factors as to why it isn’t a good idea. Mainly, ohh idk… The fact that they have had no place in nature in over tens of thousands of years? Even if we managed to create an artificial habitat and role in an ecosystem for them, they would be very vulnerable due to megafauna’s increased minimum land requirements because of their size and in danger constantly due to climate change.

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You’re using the same logic my dad uses to rail against going to Mars. He says there is no worthwhile reason to go there when more pressing matters on earth are in abundance.

        Just like you, he is missing the forest for the trees, angrily ignorant to the fact that the knowledge you gained from trying to achieve a seemingly worthless achievement is the actual value, not in the achievement itself.

        The achievement is just a convenient goal to make the science more exciting to the general public so as to garner more financial support from both private and government sources. Each of the steps needed to gain that achievement may not have gained as much funding as they do now if they were presented separately from that final goal.

        • scholar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          When your house is on fire you don’t start looking for package holidays to Pompeii, no matter how much you might learn. We have all the knowledge we need to avert the climate crisis, we just need action and resources dedicated to fixing it.

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            You’ll find that we have a lot of people on this planet, we can multitask. We can research genetic engineering, and green energy, and medical technology, and recycling processes, as well as things that don’t advance those immediate goals, like microprocessors, meta materials, superconductors, astrophysics, geology, mathematics, etc.

            When your house will be burning for the next few hundred years and you still have to live in it because even on fire it’s the best house around, maybe just get on with your life and do something productive? Perhaps some of us can move out eventually, but it would take a lot of research in a lot of different fields, probably even genetics…

            • scholar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Something productive like finding a fire extinguisher, or productive like recreating fluffy elephants into an ecosystem that no longer exists?

              • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Something like learning to make perfect custom designed edits to genes, such abilities could easily save hundreds of millions when the next major plague or crop blight hits. We’ll definitely find ways to make hardier crops, that can survive harsher climates. Who knows, we could get so good at it that we could afford to just strengthen every species we can find with genes to help them survive the rapidly changing world, at least for long enough for us to turn things around. Maybe we could design lichens or mosses that could grow on Mars, adding oxygen to the atmosphere. Maybe we could learn to do even more impactful things that I can’t even think of right now (since I’m not even a biologist).

                And maybe, just maybe, genetics isn’t even the only field that could turn out to be extraordinarily important to survival in the future. Maybe we should continue to pursue every field of science and engineering… Because fucking obviously we should.

                So why mammoths? Why not? Bringing back the mammoth is just a bit of problem solving, it’s an exercise with a tangible goal.

                • scholar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  We already do genetic modification for crops and disease research, bringing back mammoth lookalikes won’t help with that. There is no problem being solved here, the only end goal is chasing headlines to be able to say ‘we brought back mammoths’. It’s a pointless egotistical endeavour that helps no-one.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            What do you want the geneticists to do? They are educated in their domain, you can’t just plop them into another field

            The applications of their work is likely plenty in medicine and bioengineering

            • scholar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I want them to stop pretending that resurrecting a cold adapted species into an ecosystem that is rapidly melting will do anything productive.

              If they want to be helpful they can work out how to engineer humans that can survive 40 degree heat and breathe co2.

              • Maeve@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Maybe this is a step forward that direction? I mean I doubt poor prime will ever access it, even if that is what they’re doing.

              • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                If they want to be helpful they can work out how to engineer humans that can survive 40 degree heat and breathe co2.

                That’s what they’re fucking doing by bringing back the mammoth…

                They’ll run when they’re ready, but right now they’re learning to crawl. Or to put it differently, let them cook.

                • scholar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I was being sarcastic, I don’t want bio-engineered humans adapted for extreme heat, I want us to not let our planet get to that point in the first place.

  • mcqtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    This was wise. They had to create the woolly mice so that when they create the woolly mammoths, they can woolly control them.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I am skeptical of all articles with “scientists” in the title… but those mice are really cute. 😙

  • quoll@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    mouse sized woolly mammoth would be pretty fucking cool.

    imagine the sound when he toots his little trunk.

    could store him in the fridge.

  • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ever since I was a kid I’ve always been hyped about the idea of them bringing back the mammoth. Been hearing about it my whole life…

    But I have to ask… Why are we trying to, exactly? I mean, the planet’s heating up. why are we trying to reintroduce a woolly mammoth? It’s one thing if they’re talking about using actual mammoth DNA and cloning it, but that article was talking about specifically just turning on some genes that cause fur and cold tolerance… What is the point of just making furry elephants at this point? Where are we sticking them, and why are we sticking them there? Is there some ecological niche that needs filling? Are we going to attempt to populate Antarctica (and hope it stays cold enough for that?) with hirsute pachyderms?

    How about a different plan? As much as I have been excited woolly mammoths my entire life, let’s try something a little different. Let’s shrink the elephants we have, and introduce them into North America. Elephants the size of bison, roaming the continent. You can still make them cold tolerant, to handle winters, and give em some fur if you want. But the elephants we have are going extinct, and you’re worrying about bringing back something else. How about we save what we have? Let them roam and graze Europe and North America, replacing the Aurochs and the bison. God knows we’re not going to stop eating anything too cow like, so wild bison is basically right out. Let’s let the elephant fill these niches, and save the species. They’re too fucking smart to let die. Elephants got fucking religion, y’all. We cannot let them die.

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Reintroducing mammoths in the arctic could potentially help reduce the climate change.

      There is a scientist in Siberia who built the Pleistocene Park. An area where he reintroduced a lot of large herbivores and studied their impact. He’s saying that boreal forest have a very low biodiversity compared to mammoth steppes. The steppes have way more animals, are stocking way more carbon in the soil and prevent methane leaks by keeping the permafrost frozen due to the low albedo of the biome.

      The problem is that with the mammoths are indispensable to maintain the steppes. They are the only animal big enough to clear up trees, without them the forest is taking over and all the ecosystem of the steppes disappear.

      So (according to this scientist), resurrecting the mammoth could revive a whole ecosystem, with a very rich biodiversity and that could have a give impact on the climate.

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        So there is a good reason, then? I’ve googled it before, and the best answers I’ve gotten are basically “cause MAMMOTHS!”

        If that’s the case and there’s a good reason, then hell yeah, do whatever we can to prevent climate collapse!

        But also, give me small elephants, please? Especially if they can manage Chihuahua sized elephants. I would have so many! And I would make sure they always have a clear view of the moon goddess they worship

          • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            I mean, I figured it was more meme-y than accurate, but good to know. Still, they’re smart as fuck and mourn their dead, and seem to have rituals, sacred spaces, and generational knowledge. Shrink them suckers down and let me give a whole herd of petite pachyderms a patch of paradise, please

              • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Oompa loompa doompety doo I’ve got a perfect puzzle for you Oompa loompa doompety dee If you are wise you’ll listen to me

                What do you get when you capture and cage Tiny elephants filled with wisdom and rage? Forcing them to work against their own will What do you think they’ll do when they’ve had their fill?

                Oompa loompa doompety dack If you’re not cruel, they won’t attack You will live in happiness too Like the Oompa Loompa doompety do

                They may be small but they’re clever and bright With memories long and a thirst to fight They’ll band together while you sleep at night And stomp on your toes with all of their might!

                Oompa loompa doompety dight Listen to now and set things right You can befriend them instead of enslave And they’ll trumpet your name from tunnel to cave

                What can you gain from your wicked small zoo? When friendship and trunk-shakes are waiting for you? The karma returning from your evil schemes Will haunt all your days and plague all your dreams!

                Oompa loompa doompety doo Treat little creatures with respect that’s true Oompa loompa doompety dee Set those wee elephants instantly free!