• Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Think about all the capitalist profit businesses make for common cold symptoms alone, with over the counter meds and stuff.

      No way something like this would be allowed in our current society.

      • SelfHigh5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        6 days ago

        Just an interesting thing to share… I lived in the US until I was 40 and moved to Norway. They just don’t sell “cold remedy” meds here, or at least not even close to the extent the US does. We have sore throat drops, and OTC pain relief. Some cough medicine but it’s pretty weak imo. I suspect this is because the expectation here is that if you’re sick, you take sick time off work. You can rest and recover. Going to the doc to get sick time approved is at most like $20 and if you and your doc have a good relationship, you can do this via email. In the US, you’re expected to power through unless contagious and even then, just try to pretend you’re okay.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          6 days ago

          What you’re saying hits home.

          Conservatives have this tough guy routine, that going to work when you’re sick is just manly or “alpha”. It’s bullshit. Then they spread it so everyone else can get it.

          But the tough thing to do, is go to work, after pumping yourself full of nyquil, or Tylenol, or whatever. It’s just so stupid and obvious. They’re so “tough” yet they need all this OTC junk to ease the symptoms. Not to mention, not being productive at work, cause you feel like shit. As well as taking longer to get better.

          Personally, I prefer not to take any meds at all. Just go home, sleep a lot, drink water, eat soup, chill, rest, etc.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            Back at the start of the millenium. Way before even one day work from home was common. I worked at a place where if you were sick and did not take a sick day they expected you to work from home. You would get some ribbing for being in the office and coughing. That place was great. Also always had hand sanitizer and tissue.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I just got over being sick for 2 weeks and even though I was lucky enough to have that much sick time, I absolutely wanted the strongest meds I could get because I was miserable.

          you’re expected to power through unless contagious

          No, you’re expected to power through and they don’t give a fuck whether you’re contagious or not.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          dextrotomorphan, is the cough medicine, i find it has little effect on coughs. i believes its the 1st generations(diphenhydramine, doxylamine,bropheneramine,etc) anti-histamine that is preventing the smptoms, because also prevents mucus production via anti-cholingernic effects and the cough, besides the fever.

          and pehnyleprine has no effect on you what so ever, you need the pseudoephedrine, but its regulated in the usa, and only available at the pharmacy counter, because Pseudoephedrine is used to make METH. dextromorphan is also recently been regulated, requiring ID, because stupid young children teens, are robotripping on it apparently.

      • Sheridan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        However, I’d expect businesses would also want to reduce cold and covid’s impact on employee productivity? Wouldn’t fewer employees needing to take sick time because of cold/covid increase their profits? Outside of businesses that profit from cold/covid, I don’t see what the motivation for businesses would be against this vaccination.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Agreed, but you could spin it a number of ways. The “tough guy work ethic” cultural propaganda is to just go to work when sick. The fact that your not as productive when you feel shitty, well, the owners would have to actually care. Their argument is they’d probably prefer a sick employee only working at 70% their normal productivity, is better than letting them stay home.

          The other much bigger thing is, how much money is over the counter meds industry profiting? Do they have lawyers and lobbyists? Is this profit entrenched in Wall Street investors and quarterly profits?

          Which wins? Altruism for the worker bee, or rich peoples money and power?

      • then_three_more@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        But does that outweigh the amount of days lost from people taking sick days?

        Oh sorry America. The civilised world would be making that calculation though.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Knowing the current administration, it will end up just like abortion tourism… but instead of only being persecuted in red states, it will be federally outlawed.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        medical tourism to places like india, thailand,etc for dental and medical treatment.

      • eric5949@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        We’ll have an fda, once they rip it to sheds they’ll stock it with whoever they want to and then say look we fixed the fraud, listen to these guys now. Having a government agency that can say “no drug that competes with an oligarchs drug you can’t be approved” or “yes, you can shove unproven computer tech into people brains” is far to powerful to throw completely away.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          They’ll start giving returning Americans titer tests and locking up people with immunity up

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          is far to powerful to throw completely away.

          They could do the same with DoE and it isn’t saving that agency. There’s no particular reason the FDA would fare any better. They’ll strip it to the bone and some states will cheerfully make it completely legal for their citizens.

          • eric5949@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            We’ll see. I feel like there’s more value keeping around the institution which says what substances and food you can or cannot sell and who can or cannot sell them than there is in the institution dedicated to making sure everyone has schooling, indoctrination is easier if people are stupid.

      • eric5949@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Doubtful you’ll be able to leave as a private citizen without a good reason tbh.

        • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          What? I’m going to Europe for a ‘camping trip’. They aren’t limiting private citizens travel in or out, yet. But, I certainly will not be bringing my phone.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          To my knowledge, there is nothing indicating this is the plan at this time.

          And I sincerely doubt we’ll “ever” have that policy. Because the people most likely to go on leisure (or even work) international trips are generally middle/upper middle class who need to be kept placated to make sure they still post memes on reddit but secretly cheer that the fbi is going to protect their teslas.

          Whether other countries are going to block our access is a different conversation but is also unlikely.

          That said: Anyone who CAN get out should work on getting out.

          • eric5949@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            The venn diagram of totalitarian regimes which restrict the free movement of citizens is basically a circle, it’s coming as soon as they think they can get away with it

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              The US is following the (modern) russian model.

              Outside of war time concerns over draft dodgers (which is not restricted to totalitarian regimes), there are no “extra” restrictions on citizens outside of needing a passport. There ARE restrictions placed on “political opponents” but that can be considered an extension of the “normal” restrictions on people with pending legal issues and so forth and gets into a greater discussion of the role of law in a society.

              No. The big restriction is monetary. Which is also how control is maintained and oligarchs are protected.

              The US is rapidly speedruning a christofacist oligarchy. But that is still going to be a lot closer to a Russia or a China than a North Korea. The latter is possible and should be feared but would require a massive shift that takes away the “Things are bad for me but they are worse for Them” that conservatives globally depend on.

              • Ledericas@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                russia mostly, since alot of red state more or less mirrors russia in some form. and they are the ones that had a hand in gops rise to power, and continuance, and funding right wing groups(white supremecist, alt-right). china has thier own problems, and would rather steal tech instead of developing it themselves.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            doubt we’ll “ever” have that policy.

            They likely won’t do it just to do it; driving forces would be required.

            If we reach a point where there are serious side effects of lacking engineers, doctors, and nurses due to expatriation, they’ll stop allowing travel. It’ll come as part of a martial law crackdown.

            In the long run, people won’t put up with it; in the short run… would you REALLY put it past them?

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              You assume that the republicans and oligarchs actually care about the US being a thriving economy or even country. They don’t. They are ripping the copper out of the wall (and the gold out of fort knox…).

              Which will basically get it to the same state as Russia and China. The vast majority of the population will be in a really bad way. But those who benefit will likely stick around as they can feel good about being so much better off than everyone around them. And, more importantly the people who CAN consider international travel (temporary or permanent) won’t be incentivized to.

              Like I said. I can definitely see a path to a North Korea level of lockdown. But we have the template for what “works” and it is Russia and China.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      We’ve got a lot of Americans who want everything tested for 20 years to make sure your eyes don’t fall out after a decade.