• kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If America was a real country this guy would’ve immediately been removed from any and all companies he runs.

    Does SpaceX not have a board?

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    TBH I think any more low orbit telecom satellite arrays than we already have are just going to become a huge problem in the following decades.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      This has been commented before.

      Starlink flies at a very low altitude, meaning relatively high atmospheric drag, and a very short period of time before their sats deorbit if they go dead, less than ten years.

      It’s nowhere near the problem everyone makes it out to be.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Official statemens claim they run for about 5 years, deorbit anywhere, and do NOT always burn up in reentry.

      • learningduck@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        My guess is better coverage and latency with its sheer number of satellites.

        They use low earth orbit, which require them to use more satellites, but lowered latency.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Technically, and this is purely semantics, coverage is the major downside to starlink. They are faster, though.

          The coverage of satellites has an exponential factor of the distance of that satellite to earth. If you had the satellite further out then its signal could reach a wider area before being cut off by the curvature of the earth. However, as the distance increases, so does latency.

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Now, I don’t know, but I would assume its the latency. Starlink has a (impressively) low ping of < 100ms, while existing alternatives usually have 600ms+. Now, that’s only relevant if they are using it for stuff like flying drones.

  • xye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ah, the full Hitler, a bold move let’s see how it plays out.

    • Renohren@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s called One Web by Eutelsat. Same latency and reliability, but less Mb/s about 70 Mb/s (and does it matter much for the few Kb packets to relay small amounts of data?).

  • halfapage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “My starlink system”. He’s literally a walking, talking “you made this? I made this” meme.

    • phampyk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      Except for the fact that he doesn’t make anything, he pays people who do, then takes the credit for it. Is his way with everything: companies, gaming profiles…

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      I get what you’re saying, but I refer to my car as…my car. I didn’t turn a wrench in its construction, nor did I design it, but it’s still mine.

      • Betty_Boopie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        “I literally challenged Putin to one on one physical combat over Ukraine and my starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army.”

        It’s the first sentence of the quoted tweet.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        The interior, initial Musk tweet. It’s a snippet in the middle of a sentence.

  • rraggl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That would be Eutelsat, but it is smaller in scale (at the moment) and therefore more expensive. It’s also said to be less userfriendly, but that should be possible to fix.

  • adm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    208
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    When the war was turning in Ukraine’s favor and they were about to push into Russia, he shut it off and crippled their counter offensive. I remember. Fuck Elon and fuck starlink.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      Which is why Starlink needs to be confiscated and managed by NATO. Somebody has to operate it, and it should be an entity who is on the side of Freedom amd Democracy.

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        They’re presumably talking about the Kursk Oblast. Edit: probably not, see responses.

        • altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          6 hours ago

          IIRC that was long after that. The initial shutoff of Starlink happened around the explosions targeting the Crimean bridge and them introducing their naval drones.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Close. There was a geobarrier that he refused to remove. Because attacks against Russia are aggression.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Hey, rest of the Democratic world, there are a whole bunch of ex feds right now needing funds and direction for their anger. Maybe you should tap into them if you need someone to rid you of this meddlesome Chancellor.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    8 hours ago

    He also challenged Zuck to a cage match and chickened out when Zuck accepted. They’re both pieces of shit.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      He even chickened out of his recent offer to come on the Daily Show and debate Job Stewart! He’s a Nazi coward even when it’s just talking…

    • Benjaben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Lol I forgot about that! Yeah fuck em both of course, but I feel like most folks would put their money on the ex-KGB agent who seized and kept control of freakin’ Russia over nepo-baby “gamer”, “engineer” Musk. What a goofy threat. And I say that as a middling gamer and engineer myself lol

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I hate Zuck but in this match I’m thinking if it’s not mutually assured destruction, then I might root for Zuck. Elon is becoming a very big problem.