• TheViper123@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They were too cowardly to enact any change, and just tried to keep the status quo.

      Refused to act against an attempted coup by the previous president, and suffered for it, as they rightly should.

  • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This dumbass argument again.

    You need an opposition party then. If you keep blaming the voters you are going to keep digging your own grave. In America you have only two parties and legit no opposition party. In this way guess what, FASCISM always wins.

    Also Please honestly explain to me, how in the fuck is fascism lite ever going to beat fascism?

    • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Bro, DSA leaders have flat out said that that is too much fucking work. They could have a seat at the table, but that comes with the expectation that they will sit down, and in good faith, do some fucking work. But they don’t want a seat at the table. They want to be handed the table, all the chairs, and the keys to the building table is sitting in, and then thanked for saving the world without having to lift a goddamn finger. Obama spoke very openly about his time in office, and said that in his first year he was full of fire and optimism, and was all gung-ho about getting Americans universal healthcare or at least get us on the path to it, and very quickly learned how to be pragmatic. He never gave up his ideals, never changed his values, but in his first year he learned that he couldn’t just magically sign a paper and boom, everyone’s on Medicare. He had to do stuff that most DSA people find boring or tedious, like sitting down with Senators and Representatives and working on a plan together to get something started.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is definitely a liberal take. I don’t agree with those who didn’t vote for Kamala, but removing responsibility from people running her campaign when there are obvious glaring issues such as retracting all populist messaging and appealing to non-existent right wingers voting against Trump was a real stinker to say the least. It’s okay to blame politicians who didn’t win for not winning.

    • i_ben_fine@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      God, this is the take I want to see. I’ll take criticism of my voting habits, but it should be proportional to my power. Democrats have more culpability.

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        proportional to my power

        This is the thing that always kills me. My vote was 100% worthless. Completely performative, just throwing paper to the wind. My state was one of the few that actually went for Harris, my state governor is one of the few actually fighting against Trump, my city has so far done an excellent job fighting back against him, and none of the races were even really close. I’m sure there are many other people, in the other firm blue states just like mine, who couldn’t stomach voting for genocide when they know their vote is just a gesture.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yep, I live in California. Local ballots are more important for my state than anything federal level, and I still voted for Harris.

          I live in the worst part of California where its rural so Republicans win 60% of the vote, and state-wide Democrats win 60% of the vote. Props and city level are the only places I have a meaningful change, especially since my “city” has 5000 people.

          So if I vote aginast the Republicans running for the House, my one vote didn’t change much there as the redneck hillbillies who think California is communist are a voting bloc that can’t be swayed, and they never need ot worry about re-election. I still vote for the Democrat, but last elections had two Republicans for the seat, one was backed by Trump, one was backed by Trump’s aids and cabinet officials.

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh this again? Democratic Party: has our Neo liberalism, refusal to enact progressive policy, and backing of a genocide alienated progressive voters? Disenfranchised voter: damn it we told you a thousand times yes! Democratic Party: No it’s the voters who are wrong.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hey, hey, marketing yourself as Fascism Lite: Low Sodium as opposed to Fascism Original Recipe has to work at some point, right?

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Gotta keep tugging for those republican votes. We may need to adopt some republican priorities in order to get those voters, but its all for a good cause right?

  • Turret3857@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I voted for Kamala. My parents and grandparents did as well. I do not feel that the democrats were/are doing jack shit to court new voters. The party itself expects to just be the status quo and have people vote for it. Whether people want to admit it or not, the point of being a progressive party is to be… how do I put this… PROGRESSIVE.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh yeah, make no mistake, the Dems are fucked.

      It’s just that in '24 we had an option between “continue having a flawed democracy” and “put a literal fascist in power”, and a lot of us are still sore over folks who insisted that choosing the latter was some form of leftism. They weren’t a major force in the general electorate, but here on Lemmy, they were certainly loud, so a lot of bad feeling remains.

      • 野麦さん@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        You clearly don’t understand leftist thought. Voting for a cop, a warmonger and a complicit child-kidnapper is incompatible with many leftists’ beliefs and values. Continued aversion to actually listening to criticisms of the Dems and DNC from the left is why your beloved party is crashing and burning.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You clearly don’t understand leftist thought.

          No, I absolutely do. They preferred the fascist to working with the dreaded ‘shitlibs’, just like Thalmann.

          Nazi punks fuck off.

          • 野麦さん@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Call me a Nazi all you like, it doesn’t make me a Nazi. In fact, you moralists should take that log out of your eye and actually look at the world your status-quoism has generated

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Call me a Nazi all you like, it doesn’t make me a Nazi.

              No? You just welcomed in fascism because it pleased your prejudices and preconceptions. Sounds pretty indistinguishable from most Nazis to me.

              In fact, you moralists should take that log out of your eye and actually look at the world your status-quoism has generated

              “Wow, the world is bad. We should make it worse.”

              Brilliant plan. Millions of LGBT Americans and tens of millions of Ukrainians thank you for your ardent support of fascists taking power. I’m sure those dying for lack of supplies from USAID are thrilled as well, as well as poor Americans who can’t afford the massive increases in costs of living and are already living paycheck-to-paycheck, and the crackdown on unions.

              What a brave leftist world you’ve helped create. Maybe if you lick fascist boots a little more, it’ll become even better.

              I also find it amusing that I’m getting called a ‘moralist’ because I advocated the utilitarian option. What fucking insanity.

              • 野麦さん@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Millions of LGBT Americans

                You’re talking to one, and no, the Democrats have backstabbed us at every opportunity. Especially at trans issues, which they love to capitulate on as a bargaining chip for getting their capitalist donors more money.

                Maybe if you lick fascist boots a little more, it’ll become even better.

                If you walk outside and throw a brick in the face of a cop, you can talk to me about what it means to be a bootlicker.

                I also find it amusing that I’m getting called a ‘moralist’ because I advocated the utilitarian option.

                You advocate for action based upon a spook? Sorry, that makes you a moralist. You decided that “maximizing utility” was the moral choice, and that again makes you a moralist. Perhaps you should write a sternly worded lever-pulling manifesto to send to your congressman?

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Non-contributing rage bait. The Democrats were wrong. The Democrats still are wrong. And the Democratic presidential candidate was infinitely better than her opposition.

    Nuance motherfucker do you speak it.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        In a two party system, especially when there’s no clear “I don’t like either” option then yes, nothing else exists. When you don’t vote you’re not saying “I don’t like either party” you’re saying “I don’t care which party wins”. If you don’t care which party wins then you’re in support of both parties.

        • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          And it’s telling that so many people didn’t care whether the dictator or Democrats won, isn’t it? If you’re making the case between yourself and a megalomaniac, and the majority of Americans shrug and go about their day, what the hell are you doing wrong?

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes but in discussing politics we are not relegated to the same limitations we have in voting. Thus there is no contradiction between voting down-ballot Democrat, then going home and tweeting “I hate Dick Cheney and the Democrats.”

          OP makes a clownish commentary on this. If someone did not vote blue who probably should have, shame on them, but the Democrats are still wrong.

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes, political discussions are not as limited in options as voting and there absolutely should be a political discussion about the Democratic party. They suck, have sucked and will continue to suck, unless they change.

            And I agree that there’s no contradiction. I’d even go as far as to say there was no contradiction in voting for Harris and then tweeting “the democratic candidate sucks”, because you have to vote for someone and Trump (clearly) was the worse option.

            My point was rather that if you dislike a party and you don’t vote for them then you are in support of the other party, even if you don’t vote at all. The nuances get kicked out when it comes to voting.

            • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              My point was rather that if you dislike a party and you don’t vote for them then you are in support of the other party, even if you don’t vote at all

              And that is a dog shit point. An easy example: California. Nobody who didn’t vote in CA supported Trump by not voting, unless you don’t know how elections work

              Stop trying to blame those not at fault you weird authoritarian

              • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Just because the electoral college is a stupid thing doesn’t mean I’m not right. Had it been a popular vote those non-votes would’ve mattered.

                • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Had it been a popular vote those non-votes would’ve mattered.

                  Why yes, if it was a completely different situation then it’d be a completely different situation

                  10/10 you dolt

        • koregro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ever heard of third parties? I’ve voted Green Party since I could vote. There is the Libertarian, Reform, Constitutional, and several other parties.

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Yeah, they’re the non-vote parties. FPTP voting always devolves down to 2 parties, see Duverger’s Law. Even if by some miracle a 3rd party wins (and continues winning) they will eventually kick one of the previous 2 parties out and take their place as the new party in the 2 party system. In practice if my memory doesn’t fail me voting 3rd party hasn’t mattered for over a century because the 2 main parties are so entrenched, so voting for 3rd party is more or less throwing away your vote.

            • koregro@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Well I would rather throw my vote away then vote for murdering sociopaths

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    ¿Por Qué No Los Dos?

    When it was the day of the general election and we were guaranteed to either get mainstream Democrat or Trump 2.0: The Revenge Tour, I could not morally justify any vote that didn’t minimize the chances of Trump winning.

    But in the present day, and in the time leading up to the election, god damn the Democrats feel so worthless. Their party probably needs to be completely rebuilt even before the much much worse Republican party. You can’t have the Nice Conservative Party vs the Mean Conservative Party when the latter has gone off the deep end.

    But also in the present day, it may already be too late. So keep on writing stern letters, insider trading, and raking in the fundraising while your desperate constituents still have some money and willingness to do something!

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m still waiting for whatever the hell is supposed to happen after electoral politics has failed us, because it has.

    I was told by people pushing for people to not bother voting in 2024 that voting was meaningless and that Trump would be no different than Harris. People told me that the solidarity of grassroots organization was the only way to see any real change, and that we had to reject the DNC at all costs. Well, we rejected it. What now?

    PS: I don’t even mean this sarcastically or to win internet points – that are even more meaningless than on reddit – on this site. I’m actually asking, what are we doing now that this happened?

  • TheObviousSolution@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The biggest problem with the US is lack of proportional representation. Winner-takes-all elections have led to the inevitable outcome. It’s also why in Europe the propagandists are trying to push for the same system whenever they can.

  • eksb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Democrats are not doing enough to encourage people to vote for Democrats.” is a warning, not a threat.

    People who make and post memes like this seem to think that the people complaining about conservative Democrats and pointing out problems in the party are not voting for Democrats. I think they largely wrong about that. We are voting for all Democrats all the time, but warning you that your messaging sucks and you are not going to get the turnout you need. It is not our fault we were correct.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The whole genocide joe Gaza bullshit proves this wrong. There were plenty of ‘protest’ votes this round. But their protest issues were stupid because trump had worse direction on all of them but for whatever reason that was ignored and everyone focused on Harris and Biden. As if trump wasn’t just waiting to glass the whole place and turn it into a resort or golf course already.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        for whatever reason that was ignored and everyone focused on Harris and Biden.

        It’s because Democrats have always been held to higher standards. Because we expect nothing from Republicans, because Republicans never deliver. Ever. So now all our expectations rest on Democrats and when you place all your expectations on one thing, it will always fail to live up.

        So Democrats have to be flawless while Republicans get to literally be lawless.

        Pretty stupid country we’ve got here. Signing our democracy away because one party can’t be perfect.

        • bishbosh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Democrats have to be flawless

          They really don’t and the fact that you don’t see that is why the blindness of the dems lead to their failure.

  • procrastitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The democrats objectively were wrong.

    They lost the election.

    That’s the only measure of right or wrong that actually matters.

    They literally had only one job and they fucked it up again.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They literally had only one job and they fucked it up again.

      American voters had one job. To responsibly inform themselves and make the best choice for the welfare of their nation. They failed to do so, again.

      • procrastitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        We can’t control the American voters so complaining about them doesn’t actually accomplish anything.

        We can, however, change the Democratic party to better align with the voters.

        That should be everyone’s focus.

        • Maiq@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Your comment is both reasonable and reflective.

          The DNC bots have came to lemmy. Like on reddit how they post some BS blaming others for not supporting a candidate that didn’t represent them in the primary and likely wouldn’t have in their office. Then they downvote reasonable criticism to guide the conversation to make it seem like their opinion is the only correct one.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            blaming others for not supporting a candidate that didn’t represent them in the primary and likely wouldn’t have in their office.

            This is irrelevant. On election day you get two options and you have to pick whichever one comes CLOSEST to representing you. A ton of whiny little bitches stayed home or voted 3rd party (pointless) because Democrats didn’t align PERFECTLY with them. That shit ain’t happening in reality. You grow up and pick whoever is CLOSEST.

            • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              because Democrats didn’t align PERFECTLY very well at all with them

              That shit ain’t happening in reality. You grow up and pick whoever is CLOSEST.

              Interesting, because it looks like people chose a different option here in reality. Maybe you’re wrong and just wanting your ideal to be the case?

        • peregrin5@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          “We can, however, change the Democratic party to better align with the voters.”

          Can you though? It’s not for lack of trying but y’all don’t seem to be having much success with this.

          Or maybe your methods just need work. Instead of just bitching and moaning about the DNC on the internet you can actually get off your gaming chair and run for office at the local level and convince real people to vote for you.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Can you though? It’s not for lack of trying but y’all don’t seem to be having much success with this

            What?!

            Ken Martin is a huge win as chair…

            Like, we already changed the party. It happened.

            That’s why I went from constantly shit talking the DNC to promoting it.

            Neoliberals bet everything on Biden/Harris, and now they don’t have control of the DNC anymore.

            The only people who shouldn’t be happy about that is conservatives

  • Majorllama@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Even the existence of the phrase “vote blue no matter who” is a dead giveaway as to why the Democrats failed… Again.

    You cannot run entirely on simply not being the other party. That is not enough to entice voters on the fence. You might think it is and those people on the fence are too stupid so they should just “vote blue no matter who”, but clearly that hasn’t been fucking work for the Democrats.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Trump begging to be king should have been enough. The fact that it wasn’t shows it’s not just ‘what the democrats do’ it’s that people are fucking stupid and hateful. Hell the VP doesn’t even know where this country came from. These people are not American. They’re traitors to the red coats and don’t even know what that means.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The fact that it wasn’t shows it’s not just ‘what the democrats do’ it’s that people are fucking stupid and hateful.

        Well here’s the thing: The average person does not, in fact, care about nebulous ideas like democracy. And why would they? Why did the democracy people do for them? Hint: The answer is nothing. That’s why they vote Republican, because Republicans promise change rather than more of the same.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You ignore one simple fact.

      The GOP always votes Red, no matter who.

      It takes two sides to have a reasonable discussion, but only one side to start a war.

      It’s a war and you’ve been invaded.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Elections are a popularity contest with weird rules more than anything…

    But the DNC kept trying to force uncharismatic candidates with conservative policy down voters throats, and stole funds from state parties to focus on that costing us down ballot races making losing have even more consequences.

    They haven’t just been putting all our eggs in one basket.

    They put it in the basket of a 20 year old shitty child’s bike and then put Biden on and pushed him into the interstate.

    Voter can’t fail a party, but Dems have been failing their voters for decades.

    I’m optimistic Martin will change that, enough to give him a fair shot and not just a month.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Voter can’t fail a party

      Nope, but they can sure fail their country. And did.

      I’m an adult, so I’ll take an uncharismatic candidate over a traitor felon rapist who deconstructs our federal government, destroys our allegiances, fucks up our economy, and bends the knee to Russia.

      But I accept that a LOT of Americans are simply children trapped in adult bodies.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’m an adult, so I’ll take an uncharismatic candidate over a traitor felon rapist

        Great.

        But like a whole shit ton of people tried to warn for the last year now, Biden/Kamala we’re enough to beat trump.

        We’ll need all the voters again, we won’t need anyone that was involved in either of their campaigns though. So why shit on the literal tens of millions we need in defense of less than an airplane’s worth of people who hightailed it back to their mansions?

        You get that, right? We don’t have to run uncharismatic conservative candidates to beat trump, it’s literally the worst option we have

        We can just run a charismatic candidate with a progressive campaign promise like we did with Obama. Did you forget that?

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          So why shit on the literal tens of millions we need in defense of less than an airplane’s worth of people who hightailed it back to their mansions?

          You answered your own question.

          That airplane’s worth of people come and go. They won’t be relevant next time around.

          The tens of millions of people that failed to do their civic duty and inform themselves responsibly, waiting around instead for a party to court them until they felt appeased, will still be there, not doing their civic duty next time around.

          And that is why the fault rests on American voters, not politicians that come and go.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            So you think insulting them and badgering them that they shouldn’t have a single standard then letter by name…

            You…

            You think this is the most effective move to get them back in the party?

            You don’t even kind of think what would be most effective is explaining to people how the DNC works and what the new chair is like would work better?

            Cuz like, I just have a bachelor’s in psychology, so I would absolutely love to hear what I’m missing where you think the best way to recruit people in the fight against fascism is yelling insults.

            If you want to help, actually want to help, can you do what will actually work and not work against the party?

            I know the PUMA people are still around and bitter from 08, this is starting to feel like that. I tend to just block those people tho so I can concentrate on what translates to Dem gains in the federal government