• WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 minutes ago

    I haven’t met or seen any of you… Man, the bots are really good at shitposting.

  • wanderwisley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why won’t you get the vaccine? “Because idk what’s in it.” Why did you get Chinese dick and hair pills? “Because I NEED it!”

  • entwine413@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s really stupid to not believe in aliens given the size of the universe.

    • underwire212@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I think we should be looking inter dimensionally for alien life rather than extraterrestrial.

        • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The Orvil did a episode on that where they found a two dimensional universe with life in it. The bad part, three dimensional life cannot exist in two dimensions with a digestive track, it gets split into two parts.

          I can’t imagine a forth, fifth, or sixth dimension or how a three dimensional being could survive it.

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        2 days ago

        What about the American people constantly complaining about aliens illegally entering their country? Explain this!

      • entwine413@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I also agree with this statement, although it’s well within the realm of possibility that life on Earth was seeded by an ancient extraterrestrial civilization. That’s a timescale of a few billion years.

        But it’s still not as stupid as thinking that the supreme creator of the infinite universe has a personal interest in how you live your life.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That would make some sense if not for overwhelming proof of evolution of both, animals and nature that started out with pretty much nothing

          • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            I like to entertain the idea that something similar to mushroom spores were emitted throughout a part of space and mostly didn’t work but, where it did, life was ready to ride evolution all over again from just the basics. Just fun to think about. I’m not a witch, don’t burn me

    • s_s@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “Earth First” is an interesting and compelling explanation for the Fermi Paradox.

      • dgbbad@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We are the evidence. Life can happen. It’s been proven. If it’s happening here, it’s crazy to think we are somehow special and it’s not happening somewhere else out there.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        alien doesn’t necessarily mean sapient, humanoid or even anything larger than a walnut. if you took life on earth as a sample of the universe it would be much more likely for an alien lifeform to be a plant or bacteria. and even an animal is more likely to be an insect than a mammal-like animal, much less anything humanoid.

        (someone should look into the numbers my source is just vague memory at this point)

    • capybara@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      People who are interested in aliens and UFOs rarely solely make this argument. Often, they’ve encountered or somehow know of these aliens.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That’s a bit of an oxymorinic argument those people use. If an inteligent species dropped by and had ONE look around, they would NOT turn on their high beams.

        • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          If an intelligent species was able to travel the distance to actually reach us that’d mean they are far far far far beyond our technological capacity. It’d be game over if aliens ever reached us.

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also given the scale of time of the universe. We as humans have only existed for a small amout of time on the vast scale of things.

      Countless alien civilizations may have existed and destroyed themselves, and may others may have not come into existence yet.

  • cuuube@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I swear this post is straight from 9gag. It feels like it was made 15 years ago…

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    My experience with random processes: on large scales, things either happen 0 times or many times. So I find the idea that life exists in only one place pretty implausible.

    • MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That’s the rule for astronomy. If it happens once, it always happens; we just haven’t seen it yet

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        you may define life however you like; the thing I said still makes sense regardless of definition (0 or many)

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Here I googled it for you

        It is defined descriptively by the capacity for homeostasis, organisation, metabolism, growth, adaptation, response to stimuli, and reproduction.

        If you’re gonna be on lemmy you should really learn basic definitions or at least learn how to look them up. Then you should go back to your high school and burn it down (without anyone inside) because it completely failed you.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          By that definition, the first life on earth was not alive the first 1 billion years or so, until the complex process of reproduction was invented. Heck, life doesn’t even have to be mobile, can be fused to a rock, even more so than moss or a stromatolith. Metabolism and maybe reaction to stimuli are imo the only real requirements.

  • Uncurable Utopia @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The concept of alien is inside our finite comprehension and logic. That is, if Earth is a habitable planet, and it is habituated, then there are possibilities of other habitable planets. If that so, then It’s science’s job to prove the existence of other habituated planets( eventually alien). But, maintaing this vast universe is believed to be done by an Omnipotent being/entity called God, I guess people developed this way of thinking by their conscience and comprehension. So far, science hasn’t been able to explain many cosmic events, why those happen, how they happen etc. But the melody, the harmony that lies in those events, even science sometimes has to say that those kinds of events can only be happen with the presence of an Omnipotent, conscious entity/being. Science and Religion are a total different thing. One is based on fact and the other is based on faith. Both have different psychological wiring on the mind thus people think differently towards these 2 subjects. Just let it as it be and laugh at this meme. Your faith or fact is unharmed. Don’t worry.🤝🫂

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “But the melody, the harmony that lies in those events, even science sometimes has to say that those kinds of events can only be happen with the presence of an Omnipotent, conscious entity/being.”

      No. Scientists will collectively say “we don’t know” and continue research and asking questions. Modern scientists don’t chalk it up to God. This isn’t the 1600s.

      • Uncurable Utopia @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Not knowing something isn’t the fault of science. Science naturally researches, digs up what it doesn’t know and then proposes an answer/explanation. But it doesn’t mean that it allies with the concept of religion. This loop will end up somewhere like: “If you know something, then you don’t have to believe it anymore. Because… Well, you know it now.” This kind of loophole will circulate around people who try to mesh science and religion together. Science “MIGHT” eventually find the answers behind those unexplainable cosmic events. If science find it, then it’ll be science’s success. But religion comes within faith. People believe something they don’t know the answer of, existence of. They live their life by the commands of the books in hope for what is promised to them in afterlife. That’s it. [ What would happen if religious people came to know about God, heaven and hell, afterlife is just the bottom pit of the loophole. If people knew those things, you can’t be 100% sure that all the ‘religious’ people would live their life according to the commands of their religion to get into heaven. Uncertainty exists both in science and in religion. ]

        • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          “If people knew those things, you can’t be 100% sure that all the ‘religious’ people would live their life according to the commands of their religion to get into heaven.”

          They already don’t 😂

  • Noam_Parenti@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    A lot of Christians will say no to believing in Aliens but because they believe God created humans and gave us the universe.

    Or in a similar vain, because aliens aren’t mentioned in the Bible they don’t think they are real.

      • Noam_Parenti@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not at all saying this is how I feel.

        I was raised a Christian and considered myself one until I reached the age of reason. So I have some insight into how they think.

        • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          It’s funny how a lot of kids learn Santa isn’t real but keep believing in God. Maybe because learning God isn’t real is significantly more painful to the soul so they refuse to consider it.

  • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well I’ve never seen air. Nor oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, the list goes on and on. I’ve never seen Ukraine, but I do believe there is some awful shit going on over there.

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      We can weigh all of those gases. We can also blow them up. We can also look at emissions spectrums. There’s a lot of ways to test gases. That’s why we know they exist.

      As for Ukraine… People have been there. There are pictures and videos. Thousands of years of history.

      I’m not sure if you’re joking or not because I’ve seen people with similar arguments.

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      But you’ve certainly directly interacted with all of them in some form or another.

      • Nelots@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think sentient is the word you’re looking for, as animals have sentience.

        • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It was a little bit on purpose TBH, it leaves some room for though, and broadens the scope or definition of alien life.

          We already know organic compounds can survive in space on astroids and comets, and we know these compounds can survive impact with planetary bodies.

          What’s to say these same comets have not impacted other planetary bodies in our galaxy, or have traveled between galaxies in our Universe.

          Timescales would make it impossible to know if two species on two planetary bodies would evolve at the same time.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      In my younger years I tried to make sense of the ‘God created humans’ thing by envisioning lots of aliens species with lots of gods, each catering for their own pets. Then I wondered if these gods would compete over who had the best pet, or would go to war with each other.